I have taken my answers and constructed them in a format that would be easy to read and compare:
From these results I gathered that:
- Each person asked liked the quality of my digipak and thought it was realistic and caught attention due to the make-up and close-up shot used, enabling consumers to see close-up detail like the heavy contrast of two different styles of make-up being used (skull and normal rocky make-up).
- Each person recognized that my genre was rock due to the mise-en-scene and editing.
- It appealed to everyone apart from the 19 year old male, which was due to him listening to more male formed bands. Due to personal taste this is understandable as the band I chose originally is known to target a larger female audience than male.
- 50% of the people asked recognized that I had used repeated footage, which is an understandable feature that is noticeable due to difficulty with filming times and plans.
- 1/4 people said that the poster lacked detail, which is a negative that I saw myself too.
- I was surprised to see that the 19 year old male who listened to RnB as well as Rock, was interested in my product, which I thought actually might be due to him preferring the creative product side of my work rather than the music.
- 2/4 people recognized that the fierce attitude acted out by my performer reflects the rock genre more.
More
Throughout the process of finishing my video to the evaluation process, I had shown a number of people my video to see the different responses. I received comments about my product which I thought were beneficial to evaluate, therefore noted. Such as impressive black and white shots, realistic use of shots throughout and realistic performer use.
No comments:
Post a Comment